<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urban Fabric &#038; Form Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/urban-fabric-form-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/urban-fabric-form-comparison/</link>
	<description>urbanism - landscape - ideas - theory - whimsy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rc</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/urban-fabric-form-comparison/#comment-13130</link>
		<dc:creator>rc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/urban-fabric-form-comparison/#comment-13130</guid>
		<description>The Star article gave no attribution, so I assumed they were produced in house, but I think you're right Jake that most have in fact been lifted from Great Streets - with the exception of the Mississauga and Toronto maps which look like they have been done on computer instead and wouldn't have been in Great Streets...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Star article gave no attribution, so I assumed they were produced in house, but I think you&#8217;re right Jake that most have in fact been lifted from Great Streets - with the exception of the Mississauga and Toronto maps which look like they have been done on computer instead and wouldn&#8217;t have been in Great Streets&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/urban-fabric-form-comparison/#comment-13126</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/urban-fabric-form-comparison/#comment-13126</guid>
		<description>This was a compelling article--mostly because it was interesting to see the striking graphic comparisons in figure-ground format between the different city centres, side-by-side on the page. Your format, placing them one atop the other, is less effective, although it's great to have the drawings at the scale you show them. Could you do both though? I mean, add a page with the  six layouts at a scale making it possible to see them all at once?

Another interesting comparison would be to include the inner pedestrian realms of the megablocks--so we'd see the PATH system of Toronto as a system of streets undercutting the large block patterns. I'm always a little depressed when I walk the PATH--thinking about the fact of all those "missing" pedestrians in the public realm above--and always a little surprised when I resurface, to find that even with the thousands and thousands of people streaming along in their underground conduit, there are still quite a few folks on the real streets, too.

By the way, although the Star never gave credit, I think I recognize the plans it produced as being from the Allan Jacobs book, "Great Streets"--you probably know it. I found a representative sample through google images just now (note misspelling of Allan Jacobs's name): http://tinyurl.com/yu5cle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a compelling article&#8211;mostly because it was interesting to see the striking graphic comparisons in figure-ground format between the different city centres, side-by-side on the page. Your format, placing them one atop the other, is less effective, although it&#8217;s great to have the drawings at the scale you show them. Could you do both though? I mean, add a page with the  six layouts at a scale making it possible to see them all at once?</p>
<p>Another interesting comparison would be to include the inner pedestrian realms of the megablocks&#8211;so we&#8217;d see the PATH system of Toronto as a system of streets undercutting the large block patterns. I&#8217;m always a little depressed when I walk the PATH&#8211;thinking about the fact of all those &#8220;missing&#8221; pedestrians in the public realm above&#8211;and always a little surprised when I resurface, to find that even with the thousands and thousands of people streaming along in their underground conduit, there are still quite a few folks on the real streets, too.</p>
<p>By the way, although the Star never gave credit, I think I recognize the plans it produced as being from the Allan Jacobs book, &#8220;Great Streets&#8221;&#8211;you probably know it. I found a representative sample through google images just now (note misspelling of Allan Jacobs&#8217;s name): <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yu5cle" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yu5cle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Marr</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/urban-fabric-form-comparison/#comment-13118</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Marr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 06:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/urban-fabric-form-comparison/#comment-13118</guid>
		<description>Who made these images, where did they come from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who made these images, where did they come from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
