<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jarvis Slip Design Submissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/jarvis-slip-design-submissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/jarvis-slip-design-submissions/</link>
	<description>urbanism - landscape - ideas - theory - whimsy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bricoleurbanism &#187; Sugar Beach for Jarvis Slip - a Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/jarvis-slip-design-submissions/#comment-13352</link>
		<dc:creator>Bricoleurbanism &#187; Sugar Beach for Jarvis Slip - a Defense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/jarvis-slip-design-submissions/#comment-13352</guid>
		<description>[...] The Star&#8217;s Christopher Hume today wrote a scathing attack on Waterfront Toronto&#8217;s jury of &#8220;insiders&#8221; for its choice of Sugar Beach as winner of the Jarvis Slip Public Space Innovative Design Competition (see images from the 3 designs in our previous post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Star&#8217;s Christopher Hume today wrote a scathing attack on Waterfront Toronto&#8217;s jury of &#8220;insiders&#8221; for its choice of Sugar Beach as winner of the Jarvis Slip Public Space Innovative Design Competition (see images from the 3 designs in our previous post). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
